Masterlease Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 15 Jul 2010

REPAYMENT CLAIM – VAT on HP contracts – Repossession – Whether ‘output tax which was not due’ in VATA 1994 s.80(1)(a) took account of output tax not declared on sale of repossessed cars – Yes
CARS – Sale of cars repossessed under HP contracts – Desupply – Some work including valeting before resale – ‘Same condition’ – VAT (Cars) Order 1992 Art 4.1(a) – Decision in principle – Adjourned to agree figures

Citations:

[2010] UKFTT 339 (TC), [2010] STI 2723, [2010] SFTD 1243

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

VAT

Updated: 06 July 2022; Ref: scu.422320