Martin v Goldsobel: EAT 9 Jun 2000

Citations:

[2000] UKEAT 381 – 00 – 0906

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

See AlsoMartin v Goldsobel EAT 6-Sep-2001
The employee had been dismissed. She alleged that it was because of her pregnancy, and was automatically unfair. The employers, a firm of solicitors, alleged that it related to her standards of work.
Held: To establish sex discrimination a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.265265