Martin v Director of Border Revenue: FTTTx 14 Dec 2010

FTTTx EXCISE DUTY – restoration of car – 15 kilos of hand-rolling tobacco, 1,200 cigarettes and 2,050 cigars between three people – whether reasonable not to restore – yes – appeal dismissed

Citations:

[2011] UKFTT 4 (TC)

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 152

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedLindsay v Commissioners of Customs and Excise CA 20-Feb-2002
The applicant was stopped at Customs carrying cigarettes over the quantity set for personal use. His car was seized, and Customs refused to return it. The cigarettes were for his own use and for sale to family members. He claimed the seizure was an . .
CitedGascoyne v Customs and Excise and Another CA 28-Jul-2004
The Commissioners had found what they considered to be an excess of dutiable goods brought into the country by the tax payer, and had forfeited the car. The court considered the effect of the Gora case.
Held: The difficult statements in Gora . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Customs and Excise

Updated: 01 September 2022; Ref: scu.428213