Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Violation of Art. 9; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient; Costs and expenses award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings
Citations:
[1996] ECHR 41, 18748/91, (1997) 23 EHRR 387, 2 BHRC 110
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – Blake v Associated Newspapers Ltd QBD 31-Jul-2003
The claimant, a former Anglican priest, sued in defamation. The defendant argued that the claim was non-justiciable since it would require the court to adjudicate on matters of faith and religious doctrine.
Held: The claim could not be heard. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights
Updated: 18 November 2022; Ref: scu.165447
