Malpas v St Ermin’s Property Ltd: CA 1992

Judges:

Dillon LJ

Citations:

[1992] 1 EGLR 109

Statutes:

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 2(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedMalekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Limited HL 5-Dec-2002
A house and an adjoining building had been first demised under one lease, then separated vertically. Two separate residential properties now existed.
Held: The vertical division meant that the two houses could not be enfranchised as one under . .
CitedMalekshad v Howard De Walden Estates Limited CA 23-May-2001
The applicant sought the leasehold enfranchisement of two leasehold properties. They were contained in separate leases, but the property had been treated as one for some time. A part of one property extended under part of the other. The claim was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 05 August 2022; Ref: scu.192025