The claimant had been a dentist. He was eligible for a health service injury allowance, having ceased to be employed because of an injury. He appealed a finding that he was entitled to benefit calculated only on the average of his emoluments throughout his employment. The claimant argued that the calculation should not include the period during which his earnings were reduced because of the injury.
Held: The respondent had properly calculated the entitlement according to the rules.
Judges:
Wilkie J
Citations:
Times 04-Jan-2005, [2004] EWHC 2879 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Malekout v Allied Dunbar Assurance Plc CA 3-Feb-2004
The claimant appealed refusal of his claim under a Personal Retirement Policy. The issue was as to his right to a waiver of contributions benefit from inception or at all. He had been a dentist, but suffered an injury which became progressively more . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Malekout, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Health CA 11-Oct-2005
The claimant had been obliged to retire from his practice as a dentist after an injury. He had continued to work for three years at a much reduced income. He said that the pension benefits payable to him had been miscalculated, and that by taking . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Health Professions
Updated: 20 October 2022; Ref: scu.221714
