The freehold reversion on the lease had been divided between four landlords. Each landlord served a s25 notice relating to properties within their own area.
Held: The landlords’ notices were invalid. They had to relate to the entire holding. The notices were insufficiently clear on this point and left the tenant prejudiced by the uncertainty. The tenant’s s26 counter-notice was however valid.
Judges:
HH Rich QC
Citations:
[1994] 1 EGLR 128
Statutes:
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 25 26
Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.216641