M A R v United Kingdom: ECHR 1996

(Commission) The applicants complained under articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, of their expulsion from the United Kingdom.
Held: The complaints were admissible, and called for examination on the merits. (Later settled)


(1996) 23 EHRR CD 120


Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Special Adjudicator ex parte Ullah; Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 17-Jun-2004
The applicants had had their requests for asylum refused. They complained that if they were removed from the UK, their article 3 rights would be infringed. If they were returned to Pakistan or Vietnam they would be persecuted for their religious . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.198258