Longman v Bath Electric Tramways Ltd: CA 1905

The reliance to be established by a person who seeks to raise an estoppel must be the proximate, direct or real loss (or detriment) which is asserted as part of the grounds for the estoppel.

Judges:

Stirling LJ

Citations:

[1905] 1 Ch 646

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedCadbury Schweppes Plc and Another v Halifax Share Dealing Ltd and Another ChD 23-May-2006
Fraudsters had successfully contrived to sell shares of others, by re-registering the shares to new addresses and requesting new certificates. The question was which of the company, the company registrars and the stockbrokers should bear the loss. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Estoppel

Updated: 31 July 2022; Ref: scu.242178