Lloyds Bank plc v Bowker Orford: ChD 1992

The court considered service charge provisions in a lease. Neuberger J said: ‘if the lease enumerates a number of aspects of the costs of the provision of the caretaker’s flat for which the tenant is liable, there is obviously a fairly formidable argument open to the tenant that the parties cannot have intended any further aspects of the costs of the caretaker’s flat to be included in the service charge.’

Mr David Neuberger QC
[1992] 2 EGLR 47G
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedGilje and others v Charlgrove Securities Ltd CA 4-Oct-2001
The court was asked as to the liability of five underlessees to pay the rent for a caretaker employed by the landlord. The lease envisaged a caretaker living in the building. Previously the caretaker had been paid a larger wage but had then paid a . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 23 December 2021; Ref: scu.263798