Lisk-Carew v Birmingham City Council Dr S Sharp: CA 25 Apr 2004

The claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal and race discrimination had been dismissed, but a claim of victimisation had succeeded.
Held: There was no inconsistency in the findings. In such a case, damages should be limited to the sum for injured feelings (in this case andpound;5,000).

Judges:

Kennedy, May, Hooper LJJ

Citations:

Times 07-Jun-2004, Gazette 20-May-2004

Statutes:

Race Relations Act 1976 1 2(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromLisk-Carew v Birmingham City Council, Sharp EAT 21-Oct-2003
EAT Race Discrimination – Indirect . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Discrimination, Damages

Updated: 09 May 2022; Ref: scu.199547