Lewis Woolf Griptight Ltd v Corfield: EAT 25 Mar 1997

The applicant succeeded on her claim of sex discrimination even though her pregnancy was not the principal reason for her dismissal (and therefore the claim for automatic unfair dismissal failed).

[1997] UKEAT 1073 – 96 – 2503, [1997] IRLR 432
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedMartin v Goldsobel EAT 6-Sep-2001
The employee had been dismissed. She alleged that it was because of her pregnancy, and was automatically unfair. The employers, a firm of solicitors, alleged that it related to her standards of work.
Held: To establish sex discrimination a . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.207320