Stanley Burnton J considered the nature of an assessment of educational needs, saying that a tribunal in this type of case must necessarily look forward, and ‘the fact that the provision is specified on the basis of a promise or assurance as to the future rather than the existing fact is not, as a matter of law, something which prohibits the Tribunal from specifying that provision’
Judges:
Stanley Burnton J
Citations:
[2005] EWHC 1210 (Admin)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – DC v London Borough of Ealing UTAA 11-Jan-2010
Tribunal procedure and practice (including UT) – statements of reasons . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Education
Updated: 11 October 2022; Ref: scu.227054
