Lauchlan and Another v HM Advocate: HCJ 5 Jun 2009

The appellants were charged with murder. They appealed against an extension of time given to allow the prosecution to proceed.
Held: The appeal failed.

Judges:

Lord Carloway, Lord Clarke, Lord Mackay of Drumadoon

Citations:

2013 SCL 7, [2012] HCJAC 137, 2012 GWD 36-725, [2012] ScotHC HCJAC – 137

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

Cited by:

See AlsoHM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another SCS 17-Jul-2009
Decision as to preliminary issues raised. . .
See alsoHM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another HCJ 14-Jan-2010
. .
See AlsoHM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another HCJ 2-Jul-2010
. .
See AlsoLauchlan and Another v Her Majesty’s Advocate HCJ 8-Feb-2012
. .
See AlsoLauchlan and Another v HM Advocate HCJ 19-Apr-2012
. .
See AlsoO’Neill v The United Kingdom ECHR 13-Nov-2012
. .
See AlsoO’Neill v Her Majesty’s Advocate No 2 SC 13-Jun-2013
The appellants had been convicted of murder, it being said that they had disposed of her body at sea. They now said that the delay between being first questioned and being charged infringed their rights to a trial within a reasonable time, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.465378