The appellants were charged with murder. They appealed against an extension of time given to allow the prosecution to proceed.
Held: The appeal failed.
Judges:
Lord Carloway, Lord Clarke, Lord Mackay of Drumadoon
Citations:
2013 SCL 7, [2012] HCJAC 137, 2012 GWD 36-725, [2012] ScotHC HCJAC – 137
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Scotland
Cited by:
See Also – HM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another SCS 17-Jul-2009
Decision as to preliminary issues raised. . .
See also – HM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another HCJ 14-Jan-2010
. .
See Also – HM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another HCJ 2-Jul-2010
. .
See Also – Lauchlan and Another v Her Majesty’s Advocate HCJ 8-Feb-2012
. .
See Also – Lauchlan and Another v HM Advocate HCJ 19-Apr-2012
. .
See Also – O’Neill v The United Kingdom ECHR 13-Nov-2012
. .
See Also – O’Neill v Her Majesty’s Advocate No 2 SC 13-Jun-2013
The appellants had been convicted of murder, it being said that they had disposed of her body at sea. They now said that the delay between being first questioned and being charged infringed their rights to a trial within a reasonable time, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Crime
Updated: 06 November 2022; Ref: scu.465378