Companies with shareholdings owned by the same individual granted one to the other an agreement which was deemed to be a protected interest as a lease of the premises. Eventually the landlord company served a notice to quit on the tenant company which appeared to have been accepted. Nevertheless later the tenant company resisted possession being given. It was held that common ownership did not destroy the effect of the various acts which included acts unequivocally consistent with a surrender.
Citations:
Gazette 27-Jan-2000
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Younger v Lansdowne Tutors Ltd CA 28-Feb-2007
Renewed application for leave to appeal. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.82951