Rent review clause – whether a notice served by a landlord (a ‘trigger notice’) purportedly implementing a rent review was valid, notwithstanding the fact that it was served late; and if the landlord’s trigger notice was valid, whether the tenant had served a valid counter-notice challenging the rent specified in the trigger notice.
Judges:
Lord Justice Brooke Lord Justice Clarke Lord Justice Neuberger
Citations:
[2005] EWCA Civ 117, [2005] 1 EGLR 40
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Rennie v Westbury Homes (Holdings) Ltd ChD 7-Feb-2007
The parties had entered into an option agreement for development of land. The developer purported to exercise an option extendng the applicable period, but having accepted the funds, the land owner denied that it had been validly exercised.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222958
