The appellant regularly travelled between the UK and Sudan. The officials asked the Secretary of State to decide in principle to deprive him of his nationality the next time he was in Sudan and exclude him from the UK, in order to mitigate the risk of the appellant establishing himself in the UK to conduct terrorism-related activities. The Secretary of State made such a decision and a little later the appellant went to Sudan and the Secretary of State made a deprivation decision. The decision was challenged on the basis that it was made in bad faith in order to ensure an appeal could only be out of country and therefore more difficult.
Held: The Secretary of State was not prevented by the legislative scheme from taking steps which hampered the exercise of a right of an in-country appeal if that would or might damage national security.
Laws LJh
[2013] EWCA Civ 906
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – L1 v Secretary of State for The Home Department SIAC 4-Aug-2014
. .
Cited – Begum v Special Immigration Appeals Commission and Others CA 16-Jul-2020
Return To UK to fight Citizenship Withdrawal
The appellant had, as a 15 year old, left to go to Iraq to be the ISIL terrorist group. She married an ISIL fighter and they had three children, the last one dying. Her citizenship of the UK had been withdrawn by the respondent leaving an . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 13 July 2021; Ref: scu.513698
