Kuprevicius v Government of Lithuania: QBD 18 May 2006

The claimant challenged his extradition saying that the arrest warrant had not explicitly alleged, as required, that he was ‘unlawfully at large’.
Held: The statement could be inferred where the circumstances properly allowed that.


Richards LJ, Toulson J


Times 12-Jun-2006


Extradition Act 2003 2(5)


England and Wales


CitedOffice of the King’s Prosecutor, Brussels v Cando Armas and others HL 17-Nov-2005
The defendant resisted extradition to Brussels saying that the offence had been committed in part in England. He had absconded and been convicted. Application was made for his return to serve his sentence. The offences associated with organisation . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.


Updated: 21 May 2022; Ref: scu.242641