Krone Verlag Gmbh and Co Kg v Austria: ECHR 26 Feb 2002

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 10; Pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient
34315/96, [2002] ECHR 159
Bailii, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedAdams and Others v Lord Advocate IHCS 31-Jul-2002
(Opinion) The applicants challenged the introduction of restrictions of hunting by foxes, arguing that the law would infringe their human rights.
Held: The Act was not infringing. Fox hunting as such was not a private activity protected by the . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 May 2021; Ref: scu.167679