Koua Poirrez v France: ECHR 2005

The weakness of the analogy between many state contributory schemes and a private pension scheme is a reason to enlarge rather than restrict the scope of 1P1, treating it as applicable to all social security benefits whether contributory or non-contributory.


(2005) 40 EHRR 34


European Convention on Human Rights 1P1


Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedCarson, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Reynolds v Same HL 26-May-2005
One claimant said that as a foreign resident pensioner, she had been excluded from the annual uprating of state retirement pension, and that this was an infringement of her human rights. Another complained at the lower levels of job-seeker’s . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights, Benefits

Updated: 06 August 2022; Ref: scu.225370