Klattner v Elliniko Dimosio: ECJ 29 May 1997

(Judgment) 1 Tax provisions – Harmonization of laws – Tax exemptions applicable to temporary importation of means of transport – Directive 83/182 – Restriction of the number of private vehicles which one person can import free of tax – No such restriction (Council Directive 83/182, Art. 3)
2 Tax provisions – Harmonization of laws – Tax exemptions applicable to temporary importation of means of transport – Directive 83/182 – Article 3 – Direct effect (Council Directive 83/182, Art. 3)
3 Tax provisions – Harmonization of laws – Tax exemptions applicable to temporary importation of means of transport – National rules penalizing the importation of a second private vehicle free of tax by requiring the immediate payment of the customs duties and charges normally applicable and payment of a surcharge of an amount equal to those duties and charges – Not permissible (Council Directive 83/182, Art. 3)
4 Article 3 of Directive 83/182 on tax exemptions within the Community for certain means of transport temporarily imported into one Member State from another must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption for which it provides may be granted in respect of more than one private vehicle per person.
First, the Directive does not place any express limit on the number of private vehicles for which exemption may be claimed, nor is any such limitation evident from the wording of Article 3.
Second, such a limitation is liable to hinder freedom of movement of persons resident within the Community, whereas the objective pursued by the directive is the elimination of obstacles to the establishment of an internal market resulting from the taxation arrangements applied to the temporary importation of certain means of transport for private or business use.
5 Article 3 of Directive 83/182 on tax exemptions within the Community for certain means of transport temporarily imported into one Member State from another has direct effect and confers on individuals rights which they may assert against a Member State that has failed to transpose that directive into domestic law, or has transposed it incorrectly, and which the national courts must safeguard.
That provision – which requires the Member States to grant individuals, subject to the conditions which it specifies, exemption from taxes where they temporarily import certain means of transport for private use – appears, as far as its subject-matter is concerned, to be unconditional in so far as it is not qualified by any condition and is not made subject, in its implementation or effects, to the adoption of any measure either by the Community institutions or by the Member States, and is unequivocal, that is to say, sufficiently precise to be relied on by an individual and applied by the courts.
6 Article 3 of Directive 83/182 on tax exemptions within the Community for certain means of transport temporarily imported into one Member State from another must be interpreted as precluding domestic legislation under which the customs duties and other taxes applicable together with additional duty equal to the amount of those duties and taxes are to be payable immediately where a second private vehicle is imported temporarily. National legislation cannot penalize such temporary importation, which is authorized by that provision, without undermining the effect of the Directive.

Citations:

C-389/95, [1997] EUECJ C-389/95

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Transport, Customs and Excise

Updated: 03 June 2022; Ref: scu.161742