King v Brandywine Reinsurance Company: CA 10 Mar 2005

Excess of Loss reinsurance. In the civil courts of England and Wales is that (with one obvious exception) expert evidence on the domestic law is inadmissible.
Waller, Rix LJJ, Sir Martin Nourse
[2005] EWCA Civ 235, [2005] 1 Lloyds Rep 655
England and Wales
Appeal fromKing and others v Brandywine Reinsurance Co (UK) Ltd QBD 11-May-2004
. .

Cited by:
CitedSP, Regina (on The Application of) v The Lord Chancellor Admn 12-Dec-2013
The claimant sought judicial review of a decision not to give prior approval to the claimant’s solicitors, a well-known firm of immigration lawyers, to instruct Bindmans LLP, another well-known firm of immigration lawyers, to provide ‘expert’ advice . .
CitedVizcaya Partners Ltd v Picard and Another PC 3-Feb-2016
No Contractual Obligation to Try Case in New York
(Gibraltar) The appellant had invested in a fraudulent Ponzi scheme run by Bernard Madoff. They were repaid sums before the fund collapsed, and the trustees now sought repayment by way of enforcement of an order obtained in New York.
Held: The . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 22 January 2021; Ref: scu.223359