Kasperbauer; Griffith v Griffith; Havens; Zorab and Griffith: CA 21 Nov 1997

[1997] EWCA Civ 2785
England and Wales
CitedSekhon, etc v Regina CACD 16-Dec-2002
The defendants appealed against confiscation orders on the basis that in various ways, the Crown had failed to comply with procedural requirements.
Held: The courts must remember the importance of such procedures in the fight against crime, . .
CitedOttaway v Norman ChD 1971
Proof required for mutual wills claim
The testator devised his house to a Miss Hodges intending that she should dispose of the property in her will to specific individuals. He communicated his intention to her and she agreed to it. After the testator’s death, Miss Hodges changed her . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 02 June 2021; Ref: scu.143184