Kapeller v Rondalia Versekeringskorporasie van Suid-Afrika Bpk: 1964

(South Africa) A clear admission by an insurer of liability in the course of without prejudice negotiations about quantum was sufficient to restart the limitation period.


1964 (4) SA 722 (T)

Cited by:

CitedBradford and Bingley Plc v Rashid HL 12-Jul-2006
Disapplication of Without Prejudice Rules
The House was asked whether a letter sent during without prejudice negotiations which acknowledged a debt was admissible to restart the limitation period. An advice centre, acting for the borrower had written, in answer to a claim by the lender for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice, Commonwealth, Limitation

Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.243131