KA v MA (Prenuptial Agreement: Needs): FD 13 Mar 2018

Application by ‘the wife for financial remedy orders following the breakdown of her marriage made shortly after the commencement of divorce proceedings. It provoked, by way of response, a separate application by the husband in a notice to show cause why an order should not be made within the financial remedy proceedings reflecting the terms of an agreement concluded by the parties some three weeks before the celebration of their marriage in December 2008. That prenuptial agreement is relied upon by the husband as an effective and binding legal arrangement which the court should now approve as a final resolution of any and all financial claims which remain extant in the context of the dissolution parties’ marriage.

Judges:

Roberts J

Citations:

[2018] EWHC 499 (Fam)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Family

Updated: 13 April 2022; Ref: scu.609099