John Stewart Hamilton and others v Allied Domecq Plc: OHCS 1 Aug 2003

Lord Abernethy
[2003] ScotCS 216
See AlsoHamilton and Stebbings Inc v Allied Domecq Plc OHCS 30-Mar-2001
As a result of section 10(1) of the 1985 Act, there was no need to enter into the field of Hedley Byrne type ‘special relationships’ and whether a duty of care was owed: the statute provided the remedy, and its practical effect was that one . .

Cited by:
Appeal FromHamilton and others v Allied Domecq Plc (Scotland) HL 11-Jul-2007
The pursuers had been shareholders in a company which sold spring water. The defenders took shares in the company in return for promises as to the promotion and distribution of the bottled water. The pursuers said that they had failed to promote it . .
CitedHenderson v Foxworth Investments Limited and Another SC 2-Jul-2014
It was said that land, a hotal and gold courses, had been sold at an undervalue and that the transaction was void as against the seller’s liquidator.
Held: The appeal was allowed. The critical issue was whether ‘the alienation was made for . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 January 2021; Ref: scu.190869