Explanation of reasons for anonymity order.
Judges:
Tugendhat J
Citations:
[2010] EWHC 2979 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd QBD 5-Nov-2010
The court was asked as to the circumstances under which the identity of a claimant should be protected in an action where he sought to restrain the publication of private information about him.
Held: Tugendhat J accepted the proposition . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd CA 31-Jan-2011
Principles on Request for Anonymity Order
The defendant appealed against an order granting the anonymisation of the proceeedings.
Held: The critical question is whether there is sufficient general public interest in publishing a report of proceedings which identifies a party by name, . .
Cited – Goldsmith and Another v BCD QBD 22-Mar-2011
The claimants sought damages, alleging that the defendants had hacked into their e-mail accounts. The defendant now sought protection of her identity through anonymisation of the case.
Held: Granted. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: scu.426533
