JDB v North Carolina; 16 Jun 2011

References: 09-11121
Links: USSC, LII
Coram: Justice Sotomayor
(United States Supreme Court) The court considered the applicability of Miranda protection to a police interview of a minor.
This case cites:

  • Considered – Miranda -v- Arizona ((1966) 384 US 436, Worldlii, [1966] USSC 143, (1966) 86 SCt 1602, (1966) 16 LEd2d 694)
    (United States Supreme Court) The prosecution may not use statements, whether incriminatory or exculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of a defendant unless it demonstrated the use of procedural safeguards which were sufficient to secure . .

This case is cited by:

  • Cited – Ambrose -v- Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban, etc SC (Bailii, [2011] UKSC 43, Bailii Summary, SC Summary, SC, UKSC 2011/0101, 2011 SLT 1005, [2011] 1 WLR 2435)
    (Scotland) The appellant had variously been convicted in reliance on evidence gathered at different stages before arrest, but in each case without being informed of any right to see a solicitor. The court was asked, as a devolution issue, at what . .