Where an authority sought to enforce a planning notice a second time, against substantially the same structure, there was no need for the property to be described identically in each notice, in order for the Act’s provisions to be brought into effect.
Citations:
Gazette 14-Apr-1999, Times 13-Apr-1999, Gazette 24-Mar-1999, [1999] EWHC Admin 225
Links:
Statutes:
Planning and Compensation Act 1991 171B(4)(b) 172
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Roger Raymond Jarmain v Secretary of State for Environment and Another CA 12-Apr-2000
Brooke LJ contrasted a ‘purist’ approach and a ‘pragmatic’ approach to questions of planning enforcement and preferred the pragmatic approach: ‘Anyone who had any experience of the operation of the former law relating to the enforcement of planning . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Planning
Updated: 03 June 2022; Ref: scu.85501
