EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
Tribunal wrong to make a wasted costs order because it did not properly address the Appellant’s case that he was not acting in pursuit of profit within the meaning of rule 48 (4); and on evidence heard by the EAT he in fact was not so acting – Observations on the question of the stage at which wasted costs applications should be heard.
Judges:
Underhill P J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 0402 – 09 – 0806
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.441168
