References: [1994] UKEAT 596_93_2502, [1994] ICR 800
Links: Bailii
Coram: Mummery J P
The EAT should not accept an order by consent unless it is satisfied that there are good grounds for making the order.
This case cites:
- Cited – Hogg -v- Dover College EAT ([1990] ICR 39)
The claimant asserted unfair dismissal after his contract was changed to provide that his post as head of the history department would be part time. He had been ill, and the head teacher reduced his teaching periods. He accepted the change in . .
This case is cited by:
- Approved – Re M (A Minor) (Care Orders: Threshold Conditions) HL (Times 22-Jul-94, Gazette 12-Oct-94, Independent 18-Aug-94, lip, [1994] 2 AC 424, (1994) 92 LGR 701, [1994] 3 WLR 558, [1994] 3 All ER 298)
The father had been sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of the child’s mother. Application was made for the child to be made subject to a care order. The father appealed refusal of an order.
Held: When an application was made on the . . - Cited – A McKenzie -v- East Sussex County Council EAT (EAT/1334/98, Bailii, [1999] UKEAT 1334_98_1312)
EAT Disability Discrimination – Disability
The parties sought to settle the appeal by consent. The Tribunal was obliged to consider the merits before making an order. In this case the order requested was . . - Cited – AB -v- CD EAT (Bailii, [1997] UKEAT 1272_96_1311)
The claimant had been a cook. A poster was put up at work redrawn to show her in a sexually suggestive pose. The court now considered an appeal agreed by consent by the parties.
Held: Since the case had been heard, the Court of Appeal in Tower . .
