EAT National Minimum Wage
Employment Tribunal correctly construed the relevant clause in a contract of employment as entitling the Claimant to be paid at the rate of the NMW, albeit, as an apprentice, he was excluded from the statutory right. Appellant had not produced evidence on appeal, as directed, to show a different conclusion.
His Honour Judge Mcmullen QC
UKEAT/0547/05,  UKEAT 0547 – 05 – 1511
England and Wales
See Also – J P Garrett Electical Limited v Cotton; Woodward v Abbey National Plc (No 2) EAT 26-Jul-2005
EAT Practice and Procedure – Time for appealing.
Unlike in Midland Packaging v Clark  2 AER 66, the EAT fax receipt log was made available, by reference to which para 1.8.2. of the EAT Practice . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238816