EAT Disability Discrimination – Justification – This appeal involves alleged errors by the Employment Tribunal in its finding that the Appellant was disabled under section 1 of the DDA 1995 in respect of his ability to perform normal day-to-day activities as defined by section 4(1) of DDA.
EAT hold no error of law, thus entitled to reach its conclusion on the facts.
Judges:
His Honour Judge Birtles
Citations:
UKEAT/0767/03, [2004] UKEAT 0767 – 03 – 1706
Links:
Discrimination
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.199889
