Lord Macmillan considered the construction of the word ‘person’ in the context of a partnership under Scots law: ‘The word ‘person’ is in the singular, but it includes the plural and also any body of persons corporate or unincorporate: Interpretation Act, 1889, s.1, sub-s.1(b), and s,19. In considering whether a partnership or a group of persons associated in partnership constitutes ‘a person charged’ within the meaning of the rule, I think it right to lay aside any preconceptions derived either from the law of England or from the law of Scotland as to the technical legal nature of a partnership. In Scotland a firm is ‘a legal person distinct from the partners of whom it is ‘composed’: Partnership Act 1890, s.4, sub-s.2, but this is not so under English law. For the present purpose this distinction should, in my opinion, be disregarded . . The important thing to ascertain is the meaning of the word ‘person’ in the vocabulary of the Income Tax Acts. The word constantly occurs throughout the Acts, and I think that it is most generally used to denote what may be termed an entity of assessment, i.e., the possessor or recipient of an income which the Acts require to be separately assessed for tax purposes . . Having regard to the special vocabulary of the income tax legislation, I find no difficulty in interpreting the words ‘ person charged’ in r.9 to include the case of several persons associated together in partnership for the purpose of carrying on a trade in common whose profits are by the Acts made the subject of separate assessment and separate charge. ‘
Judges:
Lord Macmillan
Citations:
[1942] AC 402
Jurisdiction:
Scotland
Cited by:
Cited – National Grid Gas Plc, Regina (on the Application of) v The Environment Agency Admn 17-May-2006
The claimant sought a judicial review of the decision to hold them responsible for necessary works of remediation. They were statutory successors to British Gas Corporation.
Held: The legislation clearly attempted to hold the contaminator . .
Cited – Anson v Revenue and Customs SC 1-Jul-2015
Interpretation of Double Taxation Agreements
This appeal is concerned with the interpretation and application of a double taxation agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States of America. A had been a member of an LLP in Delaware, and he was resident within the UK, but not . .
Cited – Anson v Revenue and Customs SC 1-Jul-2015
Interpretation of Double Taxation Agreements
This appeal is concerned with the interpretation and application of a double taxation agreement between the United Kingdom and the United States of America. A had been a member of an LLP in Delaware, and he was resident within the UK, but not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Company
Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.242435
