In The Petition of The Christian Institute and Others for Judicial Review of The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014: SCS 22 Jan 2015

The claimants challenged the 2014 Act saying that in appointing a nominated professional individual for every child, the human rights of the family had been disproportionately interfered with.
[2015] ScotCS CSOH – 7
Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014
Cited by:
Appeal fromThe Christian Institute, Family Education Trust and similar, Mcintosh and Thomas v The Scottish Minister SCS 3-Sep-2015
(Second Division, Inner House) The petitioning charities challenged the validity of the 2014 Act saying that it was an unwarranted intrusion on the private lives of families in Scotland. . .
At Outer HouseThe Christian Institute and Others v The Lord Advocate SC 28-Jul-2016
(Scotland) By the 2014 Act, the Scottish Parliament had provided that each child should have a named person to monitor that child’s needs, with information about him or her shared as necessary. The Institute objected that the imposed obligation to . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 26 July 2021; Ref: scu.541993