In Re W v G (Paternity); In Re A (A Minor): CA 18 May 1994

The judge was wrong to limit his ability to draw inferences from a putative father’s refusal to take a test to discover paternity.
Times 18-May-1994, [1994] 2 FLR 463
Family Law Reform Act 1969 23(1)
England and Wales
Cited by:
AppliedSecretary of State for Work and Pensions v Jones FD 2-Jul-2003
The appellant Secretary of State challenged a decision of magistrates as to whether the respondent was the father of a child for whom Child Support was sought. The mother had been married, but had been living with the respondent at the appropriate . .
FollowedIn re G (Parentage: Blood Sample) CA 1997
. .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 21 May 2021; Ref: scu.82282