In Re S (a Child: Unmarried Parents: financial provision): CA 1 Mar 2006

(Date) The mother appealed against an order of andpound;800,000 to provide her with a home in which to bring up the child of the wealthy ummarried couple.
Held: The judge had erred in scaling down pro rata an award made in another large money case. The court noted that in such cases it would avoid difficulties for the child to have separate representation.

Judges:

Thorpe LJ

Citations:

Times 17-Apr-2006

Statutes:

Children Act 1989 15

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedIn re P (Child: Financial Provision) CA 24-Jun-2003
The court considered the amount of an allowance to be provided to a parent which would, on divorce, take care of a child of the family in a moderate to high income case.
Held: The carer would not themselves be entitled to an allowance . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Children

Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.240428