In re Dugdale, Dugdale v Dugdale: 1888

Kay J considered whether a condition in a trust was repugnant: ‘I apprehend that this is the test. An incident of the estate given which cannot be directly taken away or prevented by the donor cannot be taken away indirectly by a condition which would cause the estate to revert to the donor, or by a conditional limitation or executory devise which would cause it to shift to another person.’

Judges:

Kay J

Citations:

(1888) 38 ChD 176

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedChopra v Bindra CA 19-Mar-2009
The parties sought to have declared the effect of a deed of trust under which the on the death of either co-owner, the survivor became entitled to the entirety of the proceeds of sale absolutely. The gift was defective as self defeating. The judge . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Trusts

Updated: 19 November 2022; Ref: scu.323751