Ihenacho v London Borough of Croydon: CACD 27 May 2021

Whether fresh evidence from forensic consultant psychiatrists should be admitted; and if so, whether the fresh evidence shows that the appellant, was not fit to plead when a confiscation order was made pursuant to the provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The appellant was deemed to have benefitted in the sum of pounds 590,316.08. Her realisable assets were found to be pounds 283,214.90 and a confiscation order was made in that amount of which pounds 108,441.48 was to be paid as compensation.
Lord Justice Dingemans
[2021] EWCA Crim 798
Bailii
England and Wales

Updated: 20 June 2021; Ref: scu.662801