IDA Ltd and others v University of Southampton and others; University of Southampton’s Applications: Patc 28 Jul 2004

Disclosure and enablement are distinct concepts in patents law, each of which has to be satisfied and each of which has its own rules. As to sufficiency: ‘In my view, devising an invention and providing enabling disclosure are two quite different things. Although both may be necessary to secure valid protection, as section 14 of the Act shows, they relate to different aspects of the law of patents. It is very possible to make a good invention but to lose one’s patent for failure to make an enabling disclosure. The requirement to include an enabling disclosure is concerned with teaching the public how the invention works, not with devising the invention in the first place.’
In the phrase ‘the actual deviser of the invention’, the word ‘actual’ denotes a contrast with a deemed or pretended deviser of the invention;the natural person who ‘came up with the inventive concept.’

Judges:

Laddie J

Citations:

[2004] EWHC 2107 (Pat), [2005] RPC 220

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

CitedSynthon Bv v Smithkline Beecham Plc HL 20-Oct-2005
Synthon filed an international application for a patent. Before it was published, SB filed a similar application in the UK patents registry. Synthon had applied for the UK patent granted to SB to be revoked. Jacob J had found that the reader of the . .
Appeal fromIDA Ltd and others v The University of Southampton and others CA 2-Mar-2006
The claimants sought sole ownership of a patent.
Held: The judge had erred when he reversed the decision of the hearing officer that the claimant was sole owner of the patent. The court expressed its regret that the matter had not been . .
CitedYeda Research and Development Company Ltd v Rhone-Poulenc Rorer International Holdings Inc and others HL 24-Oct-2007
The claimants said that the defendant had misused confidential information sent to him to found an application for a patent, claiming wrongly to have been its inventor. The claimant appealed a refusal by the court to allow amendments to the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property

Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.227182