Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Preliminary objection rejected (six month period); Violation of P1-1; Violation of Art. 13; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1; Not necessary to examine Art. 8; Just satisfaction reserved Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-II
 ECHR 14, 31107/96, (1999) 30 EHRR 97
See Also – Iatridis v Greece ECHR 19-Oct-2000
Cited – AXA General Insurance Ltd and Others v Lord Advocate and Others SC 12-Oct-2011
Standing to Claim under A1P1 ECHR
The appellants had written employers’ liability insurance policies. They appealed against rejection of their challenge to the 2009 Act which provided that asymptomatic pleural plaques, pleural thickening and asbestosis should constitute actionable . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 06 September 2021; Ref: scu.165708