The members of the anti-vivisection association appealed against an order for costs against the Association and its members at large.
Held: It was possible to make an order against an association and its un-named members. The association had a bank account, and the order was valid.
Judges:
Mackay J
Citations:
Times 02-Nov-2005, [2005] EWHC 2233 (QB), [2005] 4 All ER 899
Links:
Citing:
See Also – Huntingdon Life Sciences Group Plc Huntingdon Life Sciences Limited, Brian Cass (for and on Behalf of the Employees of the First Claimant Pursuant To Cpr Part 19.6) v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty QBD 28-May-2004
The claimant companies conducted forms of medical research to which the respondents objected, and showed their objections by a wide variety of acts and threats which the claimants sought to have stopped. The defendants sought discharge of an interim . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Company, Costs
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.235121
