Neighbouring land owners disputed the boundary of their registered plots.
Held: The plans provided to the court and those based upon the land registry were inadequate properly to identify the boundaries. One plan of unspecified origin did give sufficient detail and settled the dispute against the defendant.
Judges:
The Honourable Mr Justice Peter Smith
Citations:
[2003] EWHC 2546 (Ch)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Hambrook v Fox CA 8-Feb-1993
The general boundaries rule does not mean that the plan used in a contract or transfer may be ignored. . .
Cited – Lee v Barrie CA 1957
Plans from Land Registration certificates of title are inadequate to set out boundaries accurately.
Otherwise: Lee v Barrey . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Registered Land
Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.187473
