Hughes v Paxman: CA 4 Jul 2006

Brief order

Citations:

[2006] EWCA Civ 887

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoHughes v Paxman CA 23-Jun-2006
The parties were co-proprietors of a patent. Mr Hughes appealed a decision confirming an order that the patent must be exploited.
Held: The comptroller had the power to make such an order. Parliament could not have intended a deadlock . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice

Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.242967