Appeal against conviction for not having a dog under proper control, it having bitten a third party.
Held: The appeal failed: ‘ the jury were given sufficient guidance as to the approach which they should adopt to the evidence of identification. It was then a matter for them to decide whether they were sure that the dog which bit Mr Falcon was Winston. In our judgment there is no merit in this ground of appeal.’
Pill LJ, Turner J
[1998] EWCA Crim 3342, [1999] EHLR 281, [1999] Crim LR 568
Bailii
England and Wales
Crime
Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570335
