The plaintiff sought leave to appeal against the level of damages awarded to her in her claim for wrongful eviction, and against the costs award made after the award had failed to meet the amount paid into court. She said that by omitting a painting from the damages, the amount payable was reduced below the necessary figure.
Held: The point was arguable and leave should be given.
Judges:
Peter Gibson, Waller LJ
Citations:
[1998] EWCA Civ 1860
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Hougie v Kranat CA 11-Mar-1999
The plaintiff applied for an extension of time to file her appeal having been given leave ex parte. The defendant opposed the application. She had been awarded damages for wrongful eviction, but the level of damages awarded had been less than the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant, Damages
Updated: 27 November 2022; Ref: scu.145339
