Hoskins v Hoskins: 1706

The rule against double portions applied so that a larger gift by will would be totally adeemed by a later and smaller inter vivos gift.

Citations:

(1706) Pr Ch 263

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedPym v Lockyer 1840
It can be sufficient for a gift to be adeemed as a portion where the donor is a parent: ‘in the case of a parent, a legacy to a child is presumed to be intended to be a portion . .’ The court queried the likelihood of an intention in a grandfather . .
CitedIn Re the Estate of Marjorie Langdon Cameron (Deceased); Peter David Phillips v Donald Cameron and Others ChD 24-Mar-1999
One of the testatrix’s children was thought to be profligate, and had failed to maintain his own son. Acting under an enduring power of attorney, the testatrix’s attorneys made a substantial gift in establishing an educational trust for that son’s . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Wills and Probate

Updated: 26 November 2022; Ref: scu.194495