Horncastle And Others v The United Kingdom: ECHR 30 Jan 2013

The claimants alleged unfair in their trial after admission in evidence of statements of witnesses who had died before the trial.

Citations:

4184/10 – HECOM, [2013] ECHR 146

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Citing:

At SCHorncastle and Others, Regina v SC 9-Dec-2009
Each defendant said they had not received a fair trial in that the court had admitted written evidence of a witness he had not been allowed to challenge. The witnesses had been victims, two of whom had died before trial. It was suggested that the . .

Cited by:

See AlsoHorncastle And Others v The United Kingdom ECHR 16-Dec-2014
The applicants alleged that the admission of witness statements from the deceased alleged victims at their trial rendered the proceedings unfair. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights, Criminal Practice

Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471024