HM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another: SCS 17 Jul 2009

Decision as to preliminary issues raised.

Judges:

Lord Kinclaven

Citations:

[2010] ScotHC HCJ – 03

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

See AlsoLauchlan and Another v HM Advocate HCJ 5-Jun-2009
The appellants were charged with murder. They appealed against an extension of time given to allow the prosecution to proceed.
Held: The appeal failed. . .

Cited by:

See alsoHM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another HCJ 14-Jan-2010
. .
See AlsoHM Advocate v Lauchlan and Another HCJ 2-Jul-2010
. .
See AlsoLauchlan and Another v Her Majesty’s Advocate HCJ 8-Feb-2012
. .
See AlsoLauchlan and Another v HM Advocate HCJ 19-Apr-2012
. .
See AlsoO’Neill v The United Kingdom ECHR 13-Nov-2012
. .
See AlsoO’Neill v Her Majesty’s Advocate No 2 SC 13-Jun-2013
The appellants had been convicted of murder, it being said that they had disposed of her body at sea. They now said that the delay between being first questioned and being charged infringed their rights to a trial within a reasonable time, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Scotland, Criminal Practice

Updated: 09 November 2022; Ref: scu.466315